InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 0
Posts 1321
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 05/14/2003

Re: gemmerling post# 8732

Thursday, 08/12/2004 12:07:29 PM

Thursday, August 12, 2004 12:07:29 PM

Post# of 53948
Greg

Why so defensive? People make valid points and you fail to give them any merit and dis them. Paul did research and brings something to the table yet you make statements with no basis or backup.

From your post:

The market for video-based law enforcement systems is about $10 million per year. FATS and AIS together have about 90% of that.

Your reply: "Even if those numbers are accurate IMO most of the new system orders will be going to Virtra." Wishful thinking?

The trend is towards interaction with the scenarios (decision-directed video branching), not the visual element.

Your reply: "This is why Virtra is the new standard for law enforcement." The new standard? Based on what - proof from the industry?

This last would explain the apparent lack of competition for VTSI in multi-screen systems. I'm not certain about VirTra's patent or how it relates to the training products. Can anyone explain that to me?

Your reply: "The patent protects the company from other companies like Fats copying their technology. Their competitors will need to find another method/approach to duplicate Virtra's amazing product." Vitra's amazing product? Per what - Kelly's letters?

Others seem to think you drank the kool-aid too and need to look at things with a more unbiased view. I have posted facts for discussion and others agree and you just dismiss other views that disagree with yours....

Why do you take posts so personally?

Take care
Bylo



These are my personal comments, observations, opinions and should not be relied upon for any investment decisions, and as always read the SEC filings for the facts of the company

Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent VTSI News