InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 1
Posts 222
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 03/13/2009

Re: None

Monday, 05/18/2009 9:47:40 AM

Monday, May 18, 2009 9:47:40 AM

Post# of 344073
i just want to add

the cheerleaders explained away the po boxes and lack of physical addresses for guard dog and the acquisitions by saying "they are web based businesses! its not uncommon to do this".

then we break out the web stats that show nothing is going on with the websites and all of a sudden, a respected, trusted much used web traffic analysis tool is wrong?

no one going to the site is the same as no one visiting your store on main street usa. it equals minimal, if any, business. which in turn means minimal, if any, revenues.

seeing how the integrity of alexa is now being called into question i went to urltrends.com and looked up the stats on all the websites. same thing. it looks horrible.

if these "acquisitions" brought anything to the table why isnt it reflected in the web traffic?

nothing. look for yourselves.

those projected revenue statements watson made were all covered under safe harbor forward looking statements disclaimers, which means, for anyone who doesnt know, he could be and probably is lying through his teeth. and nothing can be done about it because all he has to say was he thought this and he thought that and none of it panned out. an apology for being wrong , if that, is all you will get.


do your own research, this is all my OPINION