InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 2
Posts 444
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 06/09/2004

Re: m-ojo post# 74734

Wednesday, 08/11/2004 12:33:59 AM

Wednesday, August 11, 2004 12:33:59 AM

Post# of 358500
I don’t post. But this has really got me going!!

I think we should make it clear that the 38.7B would be the Float.

I know what mandatory means. It’s not a big word. What it means in the Jan 7 2003 PR is that, according to the new company cross-dividend policy they “must” (mandatory) do it. The basher’s can put any twist on it they like. That’s what it means to me. Weather it’s 8% or 100% is up to the company. I was just like everyone else in assuming that we would get the entire UCAD dividend of 7.5M. The PR didn’t say we would get it all. There was really no need to state the cross-dividend policy again. That’s why we keep hearing about UC telling everyone to read the old PR’s.
It did not make any sense to me why to company would give everything away. It’s like they are saying were not trying to build value for our company. Who would be here if you believed that?

As far as where the 75B shares for Nevada Mineral came from?
I'm not worried. They are not part of the float.


40B does fit nicely with the CIM dividend.
That number has been tossed around a bunch.
This makes much more sense than anything else I've seen.


I like a lot!

Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.