Tuesday, May 12, 2009 10:43:03 AM
"seems" to be a front for shady characters.
i have always been fair and said there is nothing i can find that conclusively links watson to these people IN THIS ENDEAVOR, other than he is using the same attorney they all have in previous bogus plays. however, the fact he is using the same addresses and is operating in the same fashion as they have in the past leads to only one logical conclusion here.
as pointed out, one of the acquisitions was using an address watson used for his defunct mortgage company. that doesnt send up at least one red flag? and another had his lawyer listed as the owner? again, red flag???
the acquisitions were non-existent garbage. done on paper and pre-designed to pump this, and also to dole out shares to other players in this. no doubt in my mind, but only my opinion.
the old saying goes, if it looks like a duck and quacks like a duck, well then you have a duck on your hands. this is waddling and quacking, so what do we have?
do your own research, this is all my OPINION
Alliance Creative Group (ACGX) Releases Q3 2024 Financial and Disclosure Report with an increase of over 100% in Net Income for 1st 9 months of 2024 vs 2023 • ACGX • Nov 14, 2024 8:30 AM
Unitronix Corp. Publishes Its Cryptocurrency Portfolio Strategy • UTRX • Nov 14, 2024 8:05 AM
Avant Technologies and Ainnova Tech Form Joint Venture to Advance Early Disease Detection Using Artificial Intelligence • AVAI • Nov 12, 2024 9:00 AM
Swifty Global Announces Launch of Swifty Sports IE, Expanding Sports Betting and Casino Services in the Irish Market • DRCR • Nov 12, 2024 9:00 AM
Oohvie App Update Enhances Women's Health with Telemedicine and Online Scheduling • HLYK • Nov 11, 2024 8:00 AM
SANUWAVE Announces Record Quarterly Revenues: Q3 FY2024 Financial Results • SNWV • Nov 8, 2024 7:07 AM