InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 1
Posts 222
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 03/13/2009

Re: DOLPHY post# 36738

Tuesday, 05/12/2009 10:43:03 AM

Tuesday, May 12, 2009 10:43:03 AM

Post# of 344073
the key word is

"seems" to be a front for shady characters.

i have always been fair and said there is nothing i can find that conclusively links watson to these people IN THIS ENDEAVOR, other than he is using the same attorney they all have in previous bogus plays. however, the fact he is using the same addresses and is operating in the same fashion as they have in the past leads to only one logical conclusion here.

as pointed out, one of the acquisitions was using an address watson used for his defunct mortgage company. that doesnt send up at least one red flag? and another had his lawyer listed as the owner? again, red flag???

the acquisitions were non-existent garbage. done on paper and pre-designed to pump this, and also to dole out shares to other players in this. no doubt in my mind, but only my opinion.

the old saying goes, if it looks like a duck and quacks like a duck, well then you have a duck on your hands. this is waddling and quacking, so what do we have?


do your own research, this is all my OPINION