InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 1
Posts 222
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 03/13/2009

Re: Mr.Analogy post# 36135

Wednesday, 05/06/2009 10:47:40 AM

Wednesday, May 06, 2009 10:47:40 AM

Post# of 343953
you failed to address -

any of the questionable things about this

- now that the "acquisitions" are done, why no solid numbers?

- shouldn't the shareholders know what guard dog has acquired in terms of numbers of subscribers, revenues, etc? not one word on any of it. only bloated, inflated projections with nothing to back them up. it stinks.

- what about one of the "acquisitions" sharing the same address as one of watsons previous, failed businesses? coincidence?

- what about all the websites having the same layout, verbage, etc? i mean they all even use $25k worth of aig insurance too! some have said "well, its the same marketing firm doing all the work for all the companies" and thats their explanation. again, just mere coincidence. i have to add that if i owned a company and found out they gave me a site that was a template, and several other companies in my line of business were using it i would be furious. brand and recognition do not matter to any of these businesses? are you kidding me? the market is tight and you want us to believe they were all ok with their websites having few features that are different from the competition? they forgot how important it was to stand out? what a joke.

- now comes watsons wifes marketing firm. pr's the day after the website was created. very, very stinky.

- then you have the internet interview. no questions from investors, no call in at all. all scripted, all designed to sell the investor. more stinky stinky.

- the investor relations line being a mobile phone number. very very stinky stinky

- all po boxes and no physical address for any of the acquisitions. lets not get back into that one. still stinky though.

- every pr sends the stock spiraling downward. not a good sign.

- watsons attorney owns one the "acquisitions". does it get any stinkier?

-no dilution pays respect to the shareholders as you said, but so does transparency. this company has none.

- to say watson doesnt want to fail means nothing. it doesnt matter if he does or doesnt at this point. he has your money. im sure he'd love to see another run so he can dump what he has left into the market, dont get me wrong. its to his benefit that this runs. you cant help but wonder who's shares you were buying back when this was in 3's, 4's, 5's and 6's. we'll never know, but i can offer a pretty good guess.

enough said - for now