haha...
you just don't like how I brought up the fact that MMs are not legally allowed to make a profit on this stock. You think that jeopardizes your naked short theory or that ridiculous sh*t that Sterling posts and says.
READ THIS; if anyone is shorting this stock it most likely isn't the MMs. If anyone is naked shorting this stock it is most likely offshore hedgefunds. That's not to say the MMs aren't profiting off this stock in a surreptitious manner - I mean, look at the mutual fund scandals, Enron, Global Xing, Savings & Loan, stockgate etc. etc. etc. - but LEGALLY the MMs can't profit off this stock, as far as I know.
And a vested individual could be a private investor, a large trader who picked up ALOT at .0001, an offshore fund, or it could possibly be a promoter, the company, or Urban himself. NO ONE KNOWS...
BUT I'll say this for 50th time - I AM LONG THIS STOCK, just providing facts and trying to open the eyes of some of those naive enought to believe everything they read here... THINK FOR YOURSELVES PEOPLE
