InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 1
Posts 222
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 03/13/2009

Re: sense_no_ cents post# 33424

Thursday, 04/16/2009 7:04:03 PM

Thursday, April 16, 2009 7:04:03 PM

Post# of 344073
i am not:

trying to sway anyone. merely pointing out the holes and inconsistencies. make your own decision. i may or may not be wrong.

why is this company buying up companies that only exist on paper? ask yourself that question. who on this board can say they ever once heard of these companies outside the conversations on this board? i am asking for honesty here. no one i bet. we have a pretty wide demographic here which more than likely encompasses areas from every corner of the u.s. so has anyone heard of them?

what tangible benefit, aside from hype, is this company getting from buying companies with zero customer base? zero revenues? zero assets? zero brand recognition? ask yourself that question as well.

this company is not transparent. check pinksheets. they are hiding info, no doubt about it. what and why remains to be seen. do you believe this is in your best interests or watsons?

i can understand why the players on this board who are deep on this one want me to shut up. no hard feelings guys. i understand.

feel free to research anything i say. i have nothing to hide.

po boxes, ahhh yes. well as you pointed out many companies have po boxes. microsoft even has one. your right, many companies do. but they also have offices and operations. not a phone number to a cell phone and po box at mail boxes etc. think about that as well. the companies you talk about probably have been heard of in the civilized world as well.

vanguard defenders? WHO???

identity defenders? WHO???

watchdogid?? real close to idwatchdog, even straddling the fence of copyright infringement on that one. but again, WHO???