InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 1
Posts 222
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 03/13/2009

Re: shinebox post# 32879

Friday, 04/10/2009 4:03:34 PM

Friday, April 10, 2009 4:03:34 PM

Post# of 343953
your post only bolsters my argument that if this info is readily available on the nevada sos webpage, what are they hiding at the transfer agent?

320 million outstanding as of november right? that leaves 330 million to dump into the investors hands during the runs now doesnt it? time and time again we have heard "wow, look how the buys outnumber the sells! go guard dog go"! and that is assuming you are correct. the investors would be none the wiser as to where the shares are coming from during this period of "non disclosure" at the transfer agent. true or not? as long as the shares they are selling are within those parameters the investors do not know until after the "non-discloure agreement" is lifted, correct?

have i dealt with nda's? yes i have. on more than one occasion actually. which is why i know the claim that the transfer agent needs to sign one is bogus. ive already explained what they are for. there is no need to require the ta to sign one if the sos freely disseminates the information to the public. it makes no sense whatsoever. unless the ta was at the negotiating table why would they be sworn to secrecy? i hate to keep debunking this bogus claim but it keeps being thrown at me.


i highly doubt anyone cares who is acquiring these companies that exist merely on paper. oh, im sorry on the web and as a po box. sorry i cant forget to list their assets. no one was paying attention as no one had ever heard of them until the pr from guard dog. a six month old unknown website and po box with zeros in the asset and income column is hardly a hot, sought after commodity.

this is such a tragic comedy here. it really is.

do your own research. this is only my opinion.