InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 0
Posts 10839
Boards Moderated 3
Alias Born 02/14/2009

Re: lexion585 post# 20601

Thursday, 04/09/2009 10:57:48 PM

Thursday, April 09, 2009 10:57:48 PM

Post# of 83044
ok, well heres (my) analysis of a report from the mine:

1. excellent
2. excellent
3. okay, minimum another 2-3 mo. delay from now
4. crock of crap, still looking for a buyer, there is no buyer due to lack of being able to commit, due to not knowing a production start date
5. part a., b.s. probably, but whatever. part b. pretty much what i expected, due to current dilution, running out of money, and more than likely unpaid bills/agreements mounting like the mountains of ore outside. but seriously, this is indeed an issue, particularly with a disgruntled land OWNER. remember one thing, if he is not getting paid, he will shut down the operation a lot easier in court than not. no judge will favor us, with a land lease not being paid. i can go on and on, but i pray no reverse split. but if they are running out of money which they obviously are, guess what is inevitable?
6. great, thanks.

kidd... u asked in an earlier post about what would be gained by not giving share holders any info? of course someone retorted that p.r.'s cost money. gee... look what this may cost shareholders now. truth and being up front and forthright would do wonders even for a flegling company like cprk. again, dotson has less than desirable business acumen.

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.