InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 26
Posts 3083
Boards Moderated 2
Alias Born 04/07/2004

Re: gump90 post# 64662

Wednesday, 07/28/2004 1:46:55 PM

Wednesday, July 28, 2004 1:46:55 PM

Post# of 358440
I don't believe a buyback/dilution scenario is out of the question...

Urban, realizing that the stock price would have to come out of the basement(especially with the upcoming news about the new lawyer and diamondiferous kimberlite) began buying shares @ .0001 or less, returned them to the treasury until recently, and now are being released from the treasury and sold back into the float.

The potential profit for the company is huge, lets say he was paying .0001 for these shares and has been selling them between .0004 and .0012. Now, one may argue where would he get the money for the intitial buyback? Well, I'm sure Urban has quite a bit of his money he would be willing to infuse into the company to facilitate such a huge return for the company, and himself as well. If not I'm sure he knows of a few financeers that wouldn't mind making a %100 return on investment, with the rest of the profit finding its way back into CMKX.

This would explains JEFF's behavior as a net seller and his particular 'actions' around CMKX pr's. Last friday, before the dividend prs, he moved off the ask and yesterday he did the same thing before the 3:30 pr. It would also explain why JEFF seemed to be a net buyer of CMKX in the basement over the past months...

just a though

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.