DNAprint Genomics (DNAG)

[dgplexus]

"frogdreaming,"

Dodging the statement does not make the statement go away. What you claimed is baseless and unsubstantiated. If it weren't, I'm sure you would have been the first to post some form of substantiation, but I have seen no evidence, whatsoever, that Tony was using those ridiculous-sounding aliases ('money_looser' and 'stockpimpdaddy',) let alone, using any aliases for anything less than honorable. I would not be surprised if someone had impersonated Tony. Hell, even I was impersonated, recently!

You make an accusation, you substantiate it. Or there is no reason for anyone to take the accusation seriously, especially considering the history involved here. (If a dog bites me 100 times, would I be wise to trust that same dog, to not bite, the next time? I think not.)

Where is the substantiation, the evidence, that must exist to support your claims, if your claims have any merit, whatsoever? Where?

Daniel