A.I.M. Users Bulletin Board

[The Grabber]

Re: AIM method as it is written

Hi Jim and welcome to the board! I've seen the other replies and would only offer this in addition:

If your system uses Portfolio Control along with its incremental adjuster at purchase and Safe (resistance), then you can probably feel comfortable in giving it the AIM tag. In my opinion, Lichello 'hung his hat' on these 3 aspects of his system. Both his book and infomercial focused on them as I recall.

There are any number of 'core position trading' systems out there that came before and after AIM but not with those 3 (albeit maybe similar and called something else).

As for your 'very few actually follow' comment I'm not so sure. I've been a member of this board here and at Silicon Investor for over 10 years and know that there are many traditional AIM users who lurk here but never sign up or post.
I think Tom has some statistics on unique visitors, and they are legion.

As for the 'Tweaking'...Who knows? For my part, any tweaks I do are in the interest of improving ROI. Can't argue with that.

AIM (and any other system) is not a 'Magic Bullet'. If it were, we'd all be 'Gazillionaires' by now <smile>.