Your anti-SOLM arguement is baseless.
We don't know exactly what SOLM has on TOY, and from your perspective, you certianly don't either, because the court doesn't. Likewise, you are fullfledged aloof if you think that you can predict what a defendant will do if discovery yields that a patent was infringed upon.
Nice try, but your lack of logic with that idea totally destroys your credibility. TOY will do what TOY will do. It's really that simple.
Bring on the evidence in discovery, and let the cards fall as they may. There's nothing else to really debate on the issue. Patents are rock solid, and to enter a courtroom with one gives a defendant a roll of the dice at best.
