InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 0
Posts 120
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 08/12/2005

Re: None

Sunday, 01/25/2009 5:32:46 PM

Sunday, January 25, 2009 5:32:46 PM

Post# of 358440
Bhollenegg at it again....

I mean goodoldboy. Once a sheep, always a sheep.

What If...
« Thread Started Today at 3:57pm »

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The DTCC did collected funds on behalf of CMKM shareholders. Stay with me for just a few minutes here as I try to put this whole line of though into something rational. Given Chrisl's phone call Friday, my mind has been swimming in the koolaid pool... ok, drowning in it.

Back to the "funds" supposedly collected by the DTCC:

These funds could not be distributed directly from the DTCC to the shareholders as the DTCC would only distribute to it’s “Participants.” It would then be the responsibility of it’s Participants to distribute to their respective clients being the shareholders of record.

Unfortunately, it was discovered that certain insiders (UC) had placed shares in the names of individuals that actually had no idea they even owned them creating an “identity crisis” of sorts as well as an IRS nightmare. During the SEC investigation and subsequent revocation of CMKM no proper way of identifying the true or bonified shareholders was available, thus the creation of the taskforce, cert pull and recommendation of the interpleader.

Unfortunately, another problem arose to complicate matters… the post revocation sales of stock. Mind you, this does not include any discussion of FTD’s of any kind as those records are kept electronically and I assume only the Participants actually have records of those individuals (possible reason for the creation of the unshareholder.com?)

We also have Tyler, whom I believe has entered "survival mode," tying up any information whatsoever that could be pertinent simply because they fear it could damage their "legal strategy."

So, here we sit contemplating how to get factual information/documentation of funds being collected by an organization that has claimed to be "gagged" by an order which cannot be found in a court of unknown location.

At this point, I am quite sure I could build a solid case in full support of bhollenegg's beliefs as he has stated them. However, I know that I could just as easily do the opposite. Somewhere in between lies the truth, and I couldn't tell you what the hell it is. But, I do know that we won't get any answers/closure arguing with each other over it.

Feel free to add to this or tear it apart.


Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.