SPOOZ Inc (SPZI)

[jcrom56]

There are no filings, no SIC number. So there is no way to see who has gotten shares for what.The share price over the span of all this dilution is about all the evidence there is to speculate on. Now, I contend that any logical person would conclude that a generic statement about pinks would belong on a board about a specific pink, especially when share performance fits the generic picture.If people can read a news release about an office followed by a long disclaimer and offer it as evidence of income with no verifiable SECOND or THIRD party verification, why can another person not offer generic observations about pinks? You should expect a credible response from those posters as well, don't you think? Why do speculative statements springing from an address belong on a board, while generic statements about pinks in general do not? Come on...for all we know KaiTrade may have a cubicle in a shared office space. Without filings, without verifiable statements, there is just no possible way to know anything about what is going on under these three walnut shells.

In summary, if Spooz will act responsibly and disclose to shareholders who has gotten shares and why, then it will be possible to give you the credible response you want. If Spooz does not act credibly about what is going on, how can we?