I would also add,that i would ask question to a guy which are trying to talk negative about a company he obvisly don`t know anything about. When Birdstep heard about the patent fuzz, they got their laywers to check it against their on patent filing. They issued a statement without saying anything negative about CLYW. A serious company don`t talk about things they don`t know about other companies and I think this George guy has FAILED BIG TIME several times while talking about Birdstep. He said that their Mobile IP Client couldn`t roam between cellular and wifi, thats a lie and he is claiming they`ve sold their IP portfolio to an asian company, thats a lie. A guess Peter Judge is more positive to Birdstep, beacuse people actually have tested their product. Of course their are issues to be solved for Birdstep and others to create a perferct roaming situation but lying, filing late, share innside information and not being able to show their product is FAR worse.
