go-kitesurf - don't take this the wrong way, because your question is a good one. But the answer to your question is that all of those you mentioned HP,IBM et al, are not responsible to Wave shareholders to increase shareholder value. So I can see clearly why none of those companies are touting Wave. They have their own shareholders to worry about.
You have to tell the people who buy shares of stock that, and Wave management is responsible to us for that as a public company. Of course, the timing of when it's best is debatable always, but if the market is beginning to take shape, why isn't Wave claiming ownership (publicly) of whatever these behemouths are going to allow them to own? If Wave doesn't know what piece of this pie is theirs --- who does? And, who else is going to explain that model to shareholders and share buyers?
Perhaps it's still premature for this, but IMO, I don't think it is. What's Wave space gonna be in the market, and what are they doing, besides waiting for the TPMs to roll out, to capture it? Can you answer that? Let's assume there's 100 million TPMs out there ---- now what? Do you feel that's been clearly articulated? Or, are they waiting for the behemouths to tell us all what they'll own? I don't hold those behemouths accountable for my shareholder value.
Just want to know which dots are accurate, and which dots aren't someday.
T123