Without inside information it is hard to determine what is being asked???...from shareholders. I would like to say patience, but I think we are all short on that. I do know in most cases that the best decision usually results from the discusions of many and not one. PA should listen to the shareholders. I believe the current proposals PA has seem excellent on the surface. However, I believe it includes alot of spending vice investing. I believe shareholders would agree to the direction of the proposals if they knew the spending could be reimbursed. It goes back to what John was saying about the creations of weatlh. I think he said there were roughly 5, and you can only do it with hard work and natural resources.
Here we go. Spend the money in Jan PA you have my blessing, but the resource to include minimal taxes will be needed to recoup that spending and recovered at large quantities until that debt is paid off...that has to happen! And you will always have to come back to the natural sources of wealth mark my words. Turning gears overnight will create job losses in other areas. We can't have that. The details are semantics. Give'em their package of shares I say. Yes include the Big 3 (PA,CA,RB) we have riskier loans out, and remove the lawsuits from states. They are a drain on the economy anyway. I am invested in a natual resource company and I am saying this. Why? Because I don't care about me. I am concerned for the people in this global economy. If this is held up because of personal needs then that's your decision and I am positive it won't be the right one. Know this. What will happen must take place now. Know where I stand on this. Do not be scared as shareholders as to what I am saying. Be strong and stay invested. I have included a legend, but read between the lines for my references have changed...
Natural resource = gravel pit (we still have that right?)
PA = ????? who can figure out who he is?
