InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 6
Posts 264
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/02/2003

Re: The Count post# 240615

Friday, 12/05/2008 11:30:48 PM

Friday, December 05, 2008 11:30:48 PM

Post# of 432721
Count--Samsung was not facing a ban the day after the initial determination. Even if Luckern would have decided on a ban, it would have taken another 6-8 months for the decision to become final and Samsung could gave settled anytime up till then. I believe the reason Sam settled was so a decision would not be made. I don't believe Nokia wants to risk an adverse decision either and they will settle before the hearing. Remember both Nok and Samsung were initially defending together and had their playbook ready. Sam settling changes the defense playbook and with the baggage they created with Luckern, I don't believe Nokia wants to see him in May.

IMO,

Eli
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent IDCC News