First American Scientific Corp. (fka FASC)

[got2belucky]

Techisbest...someone over on the "other" board also took a crck at your questions. Interesting. Thought you or one or two others might be interested in another view point.

Rafael --"Tough" questions? Not really. Seem more like set up questions. Especially after one takes a real look at the company website and PRs.
http://www.fasc.net/

"...but have we seen any pollution numbers?" And, so what if we do? Numbers can be played with and used to the company's advantage. Will knowing this important fact change the "capabilities" and the "awesome potential" of the KDS machine? They still have glass, zeolite, chromite in the leather tanning, etc., to work with. http://www.fasc.net/index.htm

"...any idea how close or far from satisfying those laws the TTR plant comes?" Laws are one thing, plants are another. Even if the regulatory authorities approve this year, the plant can be another year away. Then the never ending testing process, etc., 2006 or later is a good bet. Along with the 12th of never.

"Will the KDS really eliminate waste, or will it just move the problem from one place to another?" Waste, pollution, manure, chicken poop. Same stuff, different form of question. Refer to pollution above.

"Does anyone know how clean the burning of processed sludge is when compared to the burning of oil that it will replace? " Clean as a whistle. If it's cleaner than what's out there, guess what? They'll buy it. But, again, does it really matter in light of "ALL" the other things the KDS can do? Wasn't this question asked on this board in light of coal? It seems I did see that in going over a few past posts. Nice. http://www.fasc.net/applications.htm

It appears from looking at the quarterlies and PRs that tougher questions about the company's lack of PRs, or follow-ups, or time tables, or Ireland, Or Japan, etc., would have been far more tougher. http://www.fasc.net/news.htm See, investors usually are more interested in why a company has not yet delivered on what it said it would do in a period of 5 or 10 years. If they can't be answered, then what credibility does it give the companies or a penny stock board's answer to future potential, etc.

IMO