InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 29
Posts 9421
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 04/30/2006

Re: HALF FULL GLASS post# 16998

Monday, 10/20/2008 6:15:16 PM

Monday, October 20, 2008 6:15:16 PM

Post# of 30387
Half: "We have been privied to only portions of the Inverness and Abbott Contracts." We have seen all there was to the Abbott contract since none of it had requested "CT" status and if you noted, no asterisks. The Abbott contract does not matter unless once again, Abbott starts work on the project. As for the Inverness contract, there portions of the document small items deleted that refer to amounts paid. As to a whole section being missing on milestones? Forget it.


http://www.metrocorpcounsel.com/current.php?artType=view&artMonth=January&artYear=2006&EntryNo=4103

<<The SEC will deny as overly broad confidential treatment requests covering lengthy portions of agreements where you do not demonstrate that the omission is appropriate. Omissions will only be acceptable where you provide analysis explaining why the disclosure would be commercially harmful and why disclosure is not necessary for the protection of investors. The narrower you make your request, the more likely it will be accepted.>>





Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.