InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 52
Posts 1238
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/25/2003

Re: Ghors post# 235108

Saturday, 10/11/2008 12:53:33 PM

Saturday, October 11, 2008 12:53:33 PM

Post# of 433133
Ghors--I agree with you on the staff attorney. When Samsung's lawyer said the staff's position was no infringement, I did not take it to mean that the staff meant that IDCC's patents did not intersect Samsung's patents so that there was no infringement, instead, I think he meant that because IDCC cannot enforce the patents because of equitable estoppel, there was no infringement. IMHO
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent IDCC News