Arnold,
In keeping with the spirit of decorum I would like to agree with you in part and disagree with you in part.
Firstly, I stated that you where correct in that, like technologies need to be tested together. If you remember I agreed and even said "to be fair this was true." (hard to believe huh?)
Secondly, I feel that over and over again we are taking our eyes off of the big picture in that "IF" Harry and his group can make electricity from "waste heat" that this in and of it self is a HUGE gainer. The leveraging technologies thing again. Right technology at the right time.(this is the disagree part)
I am trying not to be so myopic as to fathom the solution being only something we use to cut the lawn or power our cars. I have also stated that automobile solutions are probably the furthest from actual acceptance due to Highway safety testing and the like. If I remember right this was substantiated by other members of this board. Ultimately, I think you and I at least partially agree in this point as well
Moving forward, I am looking at the testing they have done recently and basing my judgment on testing using a "propane" engine. The science of using cyclonic combustion is "NOT" solely cyclones. It has in fact been around for years in many white papers as a way to reduce certain emissions based on complete combustion.
Please do not in any way take what I have said now or in the past as an affront to your position or skepticism.
Regards,
FrazDog
There are no rules here! We are trying to accomplish something! "Thomas Edison"