InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 6
Posts 6914
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 07/27/2003

Re: Frazdog post# 12000

Tuesday, 09/30/2008 6:08:24 PM

Tuesday, September 30, 2008 6:08:24 PM

Post# of 28183
Frazdog, Harry by his own words stated that the cyclone engine is not more efficient than a diesel engine and his claims that the cyclone engine has fewer emissions has not been verified even by him. He compared his engine burning propane to a standard internal combustion engine burning gasoline..
Cyclone has an emissions testing machine, a cyclone engine lawn mower and an internal combustion 3 hp lawn mower. Why haven't they burned gasoline in both engines and given us the emission results?

If Cyclone has another show and can not show that their engine is not substantially more efficient or substantially reduces pollution it will not be considered as a solution to any problem. The fact that it can burn different kinds of fuel is not enough to warrant the change to a new unproven steam technology. In other words I disagree with Harry, this is not the right technology at the right time.

"If the facts don't fit the theory, change the facts."

Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.