That's right milo3. <br /> <br /> It is simply small print/disclaimer etc. because the company (141) does not own the shares. The owner of the shares is at liberty to do as they please with he shares and is not required to inform 141 of the disposition of those shares as long as they hold them to term. <br /> <br /> Seems simple enough to me. Why is it so many here try so hard to cast perfunctory information such as these disclaimers in a negative light?