only requested that you provide some support for the contentions you made regarding the purported 3 different biz models & the supposed 3 different pricing structures for those 3 different models.
couldn't care less if you support those contentions, or not, especially as it is rather apparent that SKS has retreated from numerous such representations over the years.
a recent example would be when he claimed "break-even" revs by year-end 2004 (obviously not even remotely accurate), or when he told Brian Alger from GROW that he expected something around $19M in revs back in 2001 (i think - to date Wave has only done one tenth of that number in its entire existence).
This isn't "how i see it," these are historical facts.
btw, please cite where i wrote that TC is dead. i have more than once (correctly) commented on the acceptance rate would be considerably slower than voids posit.
Wave doesn't even use its own products internally - what kind of an endorsement is that?
what do you make of the fact that SKS couldn't even identify the Intel product that was s'posed to bring in big revs for Wave?
do you think the claim of "de minimus" has any merit?
does it bother you that Wave mgmt dumped something around $5M worth of stock following the Intel PR?
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.