"Your argument defies logic"
We know this company has always relied on hyped relationships that have always failed to deliver. They did it with Internafta, Raytheon, NASA, VPN etc... Of course there perfect "FAILURE" rate has not stopped this practice, they are doing it now with TAO!
So it is perfectly logical to conclude that if these investors had "anything" to offer that could be hyped, we would have already heard about it from the company. After all, it is once again logical that these investors would want their shares to go up too.... right? If they thought there "relationship" would help the value of "their" investment, they would insist the company announce it...
Of course that's only, "LOGICAL"...
You also say...
"And no..none of it went to old debt inherited."
It's interesting that they do not believe in the company enough to take care of some of these pressing debts(particularily the IRS debt). If these investers were as "important" as you imply, this would be pocket change for them. It looks to me like they are no more than common shareholders desperately hoping additional funds could prevent them from losing everything.
Of course the fact that nothing went to old debt makes me think they may have cut a separate deal for something new... and guess who just might be cut out holding the old debt... you got the "old" shareholders!
Of course, it is only "logical" that a company we have watched devide up assets to insiders and never include shareholders... might just be doing it again!
AI
