InvestorsHub Logo

doe

Followers 0
Posts 68
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 04/02/2004

doe

Re: None

Saturday, 05/22/2004 8:14:26 PM

Saturday, May 22, 2004 8:14:26 PM

Post# of 60938
Here's George's reply, but first
Thanks for the short term stock trend analysis(sorry I forgot who and if I go back to look I'll have to start post over)
RLC, thank you for the interpretation of the late filing
Michael, can do, just sent question to George.
I also recommended George read message 1221 and comment.
INVST, glad you like the rhyme, thanks for higher quality posts

all: Be relieved again even if the subject is history, it's nice to have confirmation that didn't arrive via Raging Bull. George's reply says 3:42 pm Friday, but it arrived in my inbox today. Who knows where it spent Friday night and Saturday morning or how it got queued behind a 6:30 pm message? Here it is,(it doesn't answer all the questions I asked but it does answer 3 important ones):

[First of all, why would a major Carrier sign a deal with Birdstep to seamlessly switch their clients to Wi-Fi? The only way would be if the Carrier also owned the access point and was the ISP. Otherwise it won’t work. ASNAPtm provides a revenue sharing platform that identifies and authenticates the user to both the Carrier and ISP. For example, the user is a T-Mobile client, he roams into a hot-spot, he is immediately identified as a T-Mobile client and the recognized by the ISP, the ISP logs the services and time the user spent on Wi-Fi and shares the revenue with T-Mobile. Just seamless roaming isn’t gonna cut it. Don’t you think a US Carrier or ISP would be anxious to have a license agreement with them? Of course if they did attempt this, it would be a patent infringement. We’re not concerned about Birdstep.

Second, over the past few years there have been a lot of PPM’s, or restricted stock, sold; or given as payment for services. At the end of the restriction period the owners certainly have the right to have the restriction lifted. It doesn’t mean they are going to sell all their shares. It just means they have a well deserved option should they choose to.

Regarding Robert Leon, I’m copying an e-mail I sent another investor.

Robert Leon is still very much with Calypso. He re-negotiates his contract every year like everybody else. The resignation paper posted on the board was from Jan, 2002. Robert was resigning as president and assuming the position of CTO. According to SEC rules he has to resign. He can't just say, okay now I'm CTO, he had to follow procedure. This required his resignation as president. It sounds like there is a player on the MB’s trying to manipulate the stock with rumors. Don’t you find it interesting that all of a sudden someone digs up a 2.5 year old paper and posts it on the boards, the price drops below $2.00 and a half a million shares trade. You figure it out.

I hope you found this helpful,

Sincerely,

George J Schilling

Director of Corporate Communications

georgeschilling@calypsowireless.com

www.calypsowireless.com /i]

Now has anybody begun investigating any of the OTHER competition yet? Don't everybody speak up at once... I'd really like to get all our ducks in a row. I posted the questions I'd like answered and I think it got lost in the general panic.

Since nobody will tell me what any of those other abbreviations mean, I'll just make up one of my own: IFBN (I feel better now)
assuming it doesn't already mean something else...



Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.