In regard to questions for Bruce and so on, I want to reiterate Calibob's question...because it is very odd to me that COIN and ANVH would have virtually identical press releases, and I realize there was an explanation given before -- something to do with the same PR firm promoting both companies and being sloppy? ... but it is really unbelievable that the CEO or top Admin's would be saying the exact same thing and so on identicals, and I just don't like the dual identical PR's at all. They have similar products, but my understanding is that COIN uses a process to make their products that involves 'contaminated product' whereas ANVH's product is 100% 'pure', not involving garbage/waste sites like COIN does or something to that effect which has accumulated impurities. I think the bottom line is that ANVH's products are bio/Earth friendly, have market demand, they are expanding, the management is doing all the right things (except possibly the PR efforts, other than the stellar news releases -- and it is unbelievable how cheap the pps is given them, other than they are either just undiscovered, people think it's too good to be true or it is...but I am holding on to 152,000 shares on a limited budget...so I do believe in them)...
...but I am not pleased with the lousy PR work so far for hire (effects to pps, other than it allowed lower cost entry into the stock), and I can only hope that the new PR folks are really in it long term and will do their job well.
All that said, I am LONG ANVH and I really do believe in the company, and I am very impressed by Bruce Fischer in particular since I've heard his interviews, and he is responsive and helpful in commenting back to my emails, but I haven't pressed as much about this issue, although I'm really curious about it (the dual/identical PR's).
So please address Calibob's question about the identical PR's (again). How can that happen? I've never seen that before.
My friend thinks ANVH is a scam, and I disagree, am seeing predominantly positive sentiment here, and I just want to see the positives reflected in the pps at some point. Honestly though, I wish I had more money to invest in ANVH now.
Also, Tom Nelson is playing some significant kind of PR role, and he is responsive to phone calls, and it seems that he will be part of efforts to go on some kind of road trip or something to the effect that he has contacts with various brokers and will be doing some serious promoting for ANVH also...(he is listed in the press releases)
Basically, the fundamentals of ANVH look great, assuming the transparency and accuracy which I believe is there...but the PR has not been effective yet (my impression of the cause of the unbelievably low pps for this company with SO MUCH VERY POSITIVE NEWS -- it just doesn't make any sense to me that the stock price can drop in price AT ALL anywhere in this price zone...what idiot would sell now unless the company was a total scam and the news fabricated? I can see that, but at the same time, my hunch, for better or worse is that ANVH is legit, and I am sticking by it (not selling).
I do hope they do a better job with PR, moving to higher forms of exchange and so on, am hoping they will avoid shoddy PR folks in the future, but otherwise really believe in this company long term.
sorry for long post...my first one here. I like that Moshe seems like an insider of sorts and has a lot of positive comments as well. I've read the entire series of postings here. Overall I think the prospects for ANVH are bright, but it is volatile and I'm waiting...
Once again, though, I reiterate Calibob's question and similar sentiments and don't want it to be lost in the noise...and want a serious response for how that exactly happened.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
