InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 165
Posts 19766
Boards Moderated 2
Alias Born 12/09/2004

Re: Bourbon_on_my_cornflakes post# 11873

Tuesday, 08/12/2008 12:55:34 PM

Tuesday, August 12, 2008 12:55:34 PM

Post# of 27567
Someone please explain to me why Woodside is more than a bystander in this situation.

I understand that they have a contract from Pioneer to drill a well on behalf of the Trust.

I also understand that it is thought that Woodside failed to check into the legality of the farmout from Pioner and that is what makes them liable in this situation.

Is that is the current thinking?

I guess I don't understand why people think that Woodside would have to check further than to find out that Pioneer is the legal general partner for the trust and is empowered to make decisions subject to the trustee's approval.

Woodside has no access to the agreements between the trust and the general partner nor to the details of that relationship.

There must be something here that I am missing.

I do understand that when you file a lawsuit, you file it against anyone and everyone remotely connected, that allows you to do dicovery in all of the nooks and cranny's. So I can understand why they are being sued. I just don't undrstand why people think that they have much if any liability.

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.