InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 27
Posts 3920
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/02/2003

Re: revlis post# 230170

Tuesday, 08/12/2008 8:50:25 AM

Tuesday, August 12, 2008 8:50:25 AM

Post# of 433277
revlis, where in my post am I questioning the integrity of Merritt? Loop and I are discussing deferred revenue and overall I believe Merritt is doing a fine job. Talk about being so convinced of one's opinions that they aren't even seeing the picture discussed.

BTW, as far as questioning the Apple agreement, many here are not seeing that Ronny could be right and you could be right. From the things we know, I believe Apple is on some sort of fixed fee AND we will get additional revenue (just not from Apple) that will make the agreement fall in line with what management has publicly stated is their goal. If it was not a good deal, Sammy and Nokia would be all over us and would have used it against us. From what we know, Ronny has presented a very compelling case but we don't have all the facts. What we do know for a fact is that Merritt stated it is a good agreement, that doesn't mean the money isn't coming from someone other than Apple.

Message In Reply To:
loophole,

I am afraid you are wasting your time. The are so convinced that their opinions are facts that nothing you post will convince them otherwise. They have to question the integrity of Merritt because what Merritt has said on the subject does not agree with their calculations. I have shown how many assumptions needed to be considered in order for their opinions to become facts. They ignore all facts that contradict their opinions such as the recent hearings.

At least we know that our opinions are opinions subject to change with the revelation of new facts.

mo


Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent IDCC News