InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
Subscribe Login/Register
S&P 500
5,588.13
(
0.27%
)
US TECH 100
19,915.61
(
0.11%
)
Dow Jones
39,251.01
(
-0.24%
)
Brent Oil
85.39
(
-0.04%
)
Bitcoin
57,515.28
(
1.43%
)
Post# of 79921
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (2) Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (2) Next 10 Prev Next

brigunn

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 0
Posts 548
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 02/02/2007

brigunn

Re: chilar4567 post# 68241

Monday, 08/11/2008 10:55:06 PM

Monday, August 11, 2008 10:55:06 PM

Post# of 79921
Chilar, in you opinion could this statement be put on the backs of the FNBP?

"by borrowing against purchase orders, they showed, for minerals out of the murphy pit".

What if those orders were signed and ligit only with proof of concrete documentation before they lost the pit due to two of the entities they are suing.

Another words, what if we get the lease back as big X has stated on this board. Just who is responsible at that point. Honestly, its all reaching, but this is america. Your opinion only. TIA.
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (2) Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (2) Next 10 Prev Next

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up