I think it is clear to most "the Professor" is an employee of the University. As far as the University acting as a hurdle, this has not been discussed or posited by anyone except for you in your last post. If that is not true, please show where this topic has ever been broached.
The above web site spells out the relationship between TAO and the University fairly clearly. As you can see on pages 39 of 42 and 40 of 42, there are many other start ups beside TAO. The body of the presentation essentially promotes the University as an enabler and facilitator of these start-ups and their initiatives, with special preference given to start ups headed by professors.
As far as infrastructure goes, it looks as though the rent they receive from TAO is one among many, and that their facilities do not hinge on TAO's revenues. So it appears to me that your perceptions here are misconstrued.
Characterizing the University as a hurdle to the branching out of these start ups is in direct contradiction to the University’s stated purpose. Are you saying this illustrious institution is disingenuous in this respect? If so, again, what is your evidence of this?
It appears to me that you are presenting a false impediment so as to advance the conquering of same as being progress when in fact there is none beyond the meager content of the PR.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.