Agreed, but I think something is missing on this point. I work in academia, and am no stranger to opposing viewpoints argued by intelligent and well-read individuals. Saying that any one individual person needs to be more balanced may not necessarily be fair; that is why we have an entire BOARD of individuals, not just a few prostrating their views. I would encourage anyone who feels uneasy about certain individuals posting various "flavors" of judgment to look at our board as a holistic instrument. Let Pedro have his conservative views; without them we'd be a bunch of half-crazed greed-infested morons with nothing but profit-on-the-brain. As long as a "basher" has credible arguments for their views, don't attack them. If a "praiser" has credible arguments for their views, don't call them foolish. I've been labeled as having an "agenda" myself due to some of my past posts. To be sure, there was little positive to go on. Now there is some positive news and I have made all my money back on Quest along with a sizable profit. Not the $67,000 I could have made had I kept my investment from several months ago, but there was nothing to suggest this Lazarus would arise from the dead. In the name of academic freedom, quit attacking those who bring sound arguments to the table; instead, look for tangible evidence to counter their points. In this manner, we can have a truly valuable board that will promote investor DD and discussion. Sorry for the ramble, but you can probably tell I hang out with idealistic prof's all day!
