News Focus
News Focus
Followers 843
Posts 122817
Boards Moderated 10
Alias Born 09/05/2002

Re: vinmantoo post# 12727

Tuesday, 07/08/2008 10:07:59 PM

Tuesday, July 08, 2008 10:07:59 PM

Post# of 19309
>Why couldn't Ovation conduct the trial as if rATIII was another drug in phase II trials as opposed to waiting until FDA approval of rATIII? I understand that recruiting would be easier following approval, but it isn't a prerequisite, right?<

The ease of recruiting patients for a trial that uses an approved drug is part of the reason for waiting but not the entire reason, IMO.

Perhaps more important is the risk of running a CABG/HR trial before the FDA approves ATryn for HD. What if a patient in the CABG/HR trial experienced some kind of weird adverse event? Even if the event were not drug-related, the FDA could conceivably place a clinical hold on the entire ATryn program including the BLA for HD.

This is a low-likelihood outcome, of course, but it’s not crazy for Ovation and GTC to protect themselves from such an eventuality by waiting a few additional months to start the CABG/HR trials.

“The efficient-market hypothesis may be
the foremost piece of B.S. ever promulgated
in any area of human knowledge!”

Discover What Traders Are Watching

Explore small cap ideas before they hit the headlines.

Join Today