It's all there if you read the posts over the last couple days.
Presumably the old data will be replaced by updated findings and better expert testimony by the plaintiffs now that they have the seismic data they sought under new discovery so who cares if that particular point was upheld?
One way of looking at it is that the court was "throwing a bone" to the defense. A rather thin, hollow bone at that. <g>
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.