Cole, are you saying.......
that the financials are done and that Weinberg and GTEM are purposely withholding their release? Why would Weinberg do this or be allowed to do this with the SEC involved?
If Weinberg knows about this reputation for fraud, could they not place a disclaimer or opinion in their audit to state they noticed this fraud in the books and distance themselves from the mess?
Maybe you should share your theories with the SEC as I am sure they would be interested in hearing about the fraud that they may have missed, which is only now, being discovered by Weinberg.
With a possible settlement being negotiated in the 2nd half of July, I am sure they would be very appreciative of any evidence that would prevent them from making such a mistake.
This fraud seems so self evident to you, yet the SEC still allows GTEM to trade and release PR's about demonstrations in Stuttgart for government officials.
How do you explain the SEC's lack of personal charges against anyone currently within the company, and why do you feel the SEC has allowed the company to continue trading in the face of what is evident to you?