InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 22
Posts 6344
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 05/15/2008

Re: moneyhungry505 post# 37486

Sunday, 06/15/2008 10:25:39 PM

Sunday, June 15, 2008 10:25:39 PM

Post# of 123598
Money,the problem wasn't the pricing on the shelves,the price was the same as the competition's products.
The Nano stuff was too put more $$ in CES's pocket..40 instead of 20% margins.
The product as the claim will look and feel the same.
The problem was the product wasn't selling cuz if it was it would still be on UK and US shelves.

If it was lacked promotions/advertising the problem to fix that you need big $$$.
And who pays for that?
If PYCT gets an order from CES,they produce it and deliver to ie:say Walmart...would pyct pay for advertising when all they did was manufacture it?
Would they spend millions to advertise for CES's orders?
Don't think so.
Walmart would spend millions to advertise flushaway.
Ces would have to spend millions but they broke.
Also what would Pyct make on that order?
10% at the very most for just manufacturing it.
So you see Money not only does Pyct need big $$$ so does CES,to make this happen.