Sunday, June 15, 2008 10:25:39 PM
The Nano stuff was too put more $$ in CES's pocket..40 instead of 20% margins.
The product as the claim will look and feel the same.
The problem was the product wasn't selling cuz if it was it would still be on UK and US shelves.
If it was lacked promotions/advertising the problem to fix that you need big $$$.
And who pays for that?
If PYCT gets an order from CES,they produce it and deliver to ie:say Walmart...would pyct pay for advertising when all they did was manufacture it?
Would they spend millions to advertise for CES's orders?
Don't think so.
Walmart would spend millions to advertise flushaway.
Ces would have to spend millions but they broke.
Also what would Pyct make on that order?
10% at the very most for just manufacturing it.
So you see Money not only does Pyct need big $$$ so does CES,to make this happen.
Maybacks Global Entertainment and ZEASN Technology Private Ltd. Sign Global Licensing Agreement • AHRO • Aug 8, 2024 7:00 AM
SANUWAVE Will Host a Conference Call on August 13, 2024 at 8:30 AM (ET) to Present Q2 Financial Results • SNWV • Aug 8, 2024 6:59 AM
Kona Gold Beverage Inc. Signs Letter of Intent with Bemax, Inc. to Sell Kona Gold, LLC • BMXC • Aug 7, 2024 10:00 AM
Btab Ecommerce Group, Inc. Launches Investor Connect AI Chatbot for Enhanced Investor Engagement and Lead Generation • BBTT • Aug 7, 2024 9:00 AM
Hydromer, Inc. Announces Preliminary Unaudited Second Quarter 2024 Financial Results and Provides Business Update • HYDI • Aug 7, 2024 8:52 AM
North Bay Resources Announces Mt. Vernon Gold Mine Startup, Sierra County, California • NBRI • Aug 5, 2024 9:00 AM