InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 0
Posts 1337
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 04/09/2008

Re: venomen2002 post# 23908

Sunday, 06/01/2008 12:54:51 AM

Sunday, June 01, 2008 12:54:51 AM

Post# of 41740
Veno, Incentives should follow performance, not the other way around. The shareholders have had to wait many months for all these great things to occur, so why shouldn't the CEO do the same? It's not like he hasn't been getting paid and receiving stock compensation along the way. Weber's 2007 "total compensation" was almost half of company sales. There's no reason why he should have another 3 or 4 percent of sales. Especially when we're still waiting for X,Y and Z to launch. I would like to see Weber start buying shares on the open market! Now that would do more good than receiving a percentage in sales, with zero net income. I can't think of any CEO that takes a percentage of sales?
Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.