I also wonder WHO approved Weber's compensation agreement? Did the board of directors/shareholders issue a vote? Should a CEO have this much control over a public company that impacts each and everyone of us? What would stop him from taking 10 percent next time? It was a bad move at an inappropriate time.
I guess you think Dean sits at a desk all day.. It is Dean's patents that are running the tech..How many CEO's of public companies actually drew up the patents of all of their tech?? Not that many..and any that did do them are being compensated much more than Dean has been..How many CEOs actually are also the head salesman for their companies??Again not that many and they also get a take of the action..You say people aren't given an incentive bonus until after the company starts bringing in considerable revenue..That is totally wrong and is actually just the opposite..That is why they call it an incentive bonus in the first place..If the company makes nothing Dean gets no bonus..That is a simple fact..How many companies CEOs are also their CFO?? Not that many..and if they are they are getting compensated for both positions..You can run this topic in the ground as much as you want..but this is a fact..Dean is going to keep getting the bonus whether you like it or not..There is nothing you can do but complain which serves absolutely no purpose here but to distract from what is going on..You can always sell and get off the pot or you can hold and or buy more and wait to see if Dean actually deserves the bonus in the long term..In any case..like I said bringing up the subject here really does nothing to help the cause..I would think your cause is the same as ours..to make money..Isn't it???veno
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
