InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 1512
Posts 35187
Boards Moderated 7
Alias Born 07/12/2004

Re: lc45 post# 62390

Thursday, 05/29/2008 5:12:27 PM

Thursday, May 29, 2008 5:12:27 PM

Post# of 87366
Ic45 : Until the company publicly states their intentions for the purported increase in A/S we are prematurely playing pin-the-tail-on-the-donkey with a blindfold on .

If there is no news by EOD tomorrow the game then changes to hit-the-piniatta with Hertitage as the effigy .

As I previously stated , if the purported increase in the A/S is for NON-tradeable , restricted collateral for the presumed loans then the A/S would be a FAIR ASSET trade-off .

If , however , the purported increase in the A/S is for NON-ASSET operating expenses and is intended to increase the O/S and float then we will have been masterfully deceived , and many of the 350 shareholders will take lawful actions against the Company .

I advocate letting the company 'splain themselves before EOD tomorrow . There will be plenty of time to take the gloves off if the Company has been any combinations of negligent , incompetent , malfeasant , deceptive , etc .

Renee


To bite the worm of incite is to bite the HOOK of the antagonist . They win .

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.