InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 1
Posts 321
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/30/2002

Re: Qarel post# 1264

Sunday, 03/03/2002 1:00:21 PM

Sunday, March 03, 2002 1:00:21 PM

Post# of 47150
A bit boring, that error in my demonstration. The multiplications towards the end should have been divisions. Let's try again and be more direct:

[1] S * (pc-y) (Conrad)
[2] pc - y * (1+s) (Lichello).

We consider when both formula's are balanced, i.e. are zero. Then we get:

[3] pc - y = 0 (S<>0) (from [1]), and
[4] pc - (y * (1+s) = 0 (from [2]).

Combining [3] and [4] gives:
[5] y = y * (1+s) and throwing y out gives
[6] 1 = 1 + s

Which can only be true when

[7] s = 0

Conclusion: Conrad's method is mathematically equivalent to Lichello's method without Safe. Conrad's S is a scaling factor, Lichello's (1+s) is a translation factor.

Regards,

Karel

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.