InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 6
Posts 3330
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 03/26/2007

Re: bag8ger post# 9527

Tuesday, 05/06/2008 7:40:09 AM

Tuesday, May 06, 2008 7:40:09 AM

Post# of 69614
Agreed Bag. There are some naysayers who do it with no basis. But then again, there are others who merely state the obvious. What funny about what I just said is that it should benefit some members of this and other boards. Is the idea to push them to sell? No. Why? Because there are some of us who know that the volume generated by this or any other board for that matter will have much less of a true impact than dilution or a decent run based on real earnings or reputable contracts. The idea is to get investors to see past all the cheering that leads to a false sense of security and see every PR, newsletter, and filing for what it really is. If the indication cleary shows money being made as opposed to the possiblity, then the feeling may be different. In the case of this stock, however, a different picture is clearly painted simply by this statement right from the 10K:

"The Company has not yet established revenues to cover its operating costs."

It can't be much simpler than that. So what do we see? PR after PR none that so far indicate a fix for the above. Where's the benefit? It should get investors to think and read before they buy. Bottom line: naysayers don't need to bash a stock that's already on its way down exactly as predicted and as the filings would indicate.

Where are they now?