InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 2
Posts 639
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 03/31/2001

Re: lickily post# 62435

Wednesday, 04/21/2004 10:16:50 AM

Wednesday, April 21, 2004 10:16:50 AM

Post# of 93819
What are you talking about…….

"I don't know but most company's negotiate in good faith and assume the other side is doing the same."

Have you been following EDIG at all? Are you aware that EDIG stiffed APS for hundreds of thousands of dollars?? Are you aware they forced APS to liquidate inventory to try and recover some of what EDIG owes them? Are you aware that EDIG still owes APS close to 6 figures? Are you aware that EDIG management paid themselves bonuses last year instead of settling up the bill they admit they still owe to this day?

Are you aware EDIG has forced other vendors to take stock for debts owed?? How does the fact that EDIG stiffs companies while paying themselves bonuses square with your suggestion that "most company's negotiate in good faith"? If the F-T management decided to take the money they could have used to pay EDIG and instead, gave themselves bonuses, your cool with that right? That is OK in your book??

So when you stated "most company's negotiate in good faith" you don't include EDIG in that "most", right? In your version of things, EDIG stiffs folks but assumes no one will ever do it to them??

" And now, when they realize this and try to sue to "get paid for the two years they invested", its still their fault.'

It took these dummies two years of not getting paid to finally understand this deal was going nowhere? And in the mean time they are suggesting that they gave up enough of their own tech to F-T that F-T can now go off and do it on their own without EDIG?

You are right, there is no way management can be held responsible for these events. They HAD to continue working and giving up their tech for two full years WITHOUT GETTING PAID dime one. They had absolutely no other choice. EDIG could not stop and there was NO WAY to protect the intellectual property. Not their fault, nothing could be done.

Plus, management must just be outstanding at building relationships with the customers. This one was so good that they need to file arbitration to try and get paid on a signed contract. For F-T to tell EDIG to bag it, management must have had just a great working relationship, don't you think?

Man, just another complete disaster that is 100% not EDIG's fault. Who would have thought that after all these years this type of bad luck would still be plaguing them? A company the holds the future to all things digital and they cannot cut a single deal where they are in control of ANYTHING.

It is a good thing you are here to point out after each disaster that it is not EDIG's fault, that there was absolutely nothing they could have done, otherwise people might start to think the company is run by morons.

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.