InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 62
Posts 7557
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 01/02/2003

Re: redhot post# 67168

Wednesday, 04/21/2004 6:30:03 AM

Wednesday, April 21, 2004 6:30:03 AM

Post# of 432707
"even if there is any wiggle-room for NOK to claim that a court-litigated decision was presupposed, not an out-of-court settlement...well, that makes for a lawyers' feast and very poor arb result for IDCC" If this were the case, why would Idcc have settled the case with Ericy for the little they got rather than rolling the dice in court? Also, if Idcc won in court, would they have had to wait until appeals were exhausted before the Nok deal was triggered? Would not F and J have read the contract and given their opinion not to settle? If a court decision rather than a settlement were necessary, would this now also be the case with the Lucent suit over 3G? Perhaps some of these questions could be answered at the ASM
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent IDCC News