Hi lookingforhelp,
Look a little deeper at what heels is saying and don't construe it as negative. I've known him for a while and he talks a lot of sense.....not saying one of you is right or wrong, just that the scenario he paints would actually be very positive for us all.....but it requires an alternate way of thinking......you have to think how the insiders/ 3rd party/ related company/ merger candidate can regain a significant majority ownership of the company? This time last year insiders controlled 80 or 90% of the company. How could they (insiders/ related company/ merger candidiates) get back to that figure again......? Heels offers one possible solution to that.....that's why I say it is good for us longs, as if they control so much, they also stand to gain to such when this is 'let go'........and of course, so do we:)
All the best..and GLTA
