InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
Subscribe Login/Register
S&P 500
5,482.87
(
0.09%
)
US TECH 100
19,343.60
(
0.41%
)
Dow Jones
39,164.06
(
0.09%
)
Brent Oil
86.00
(
0.68%
)
Bitcoin
61,354.23
(
-0.42%
)
Post# of 249164
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Next 10 Prev Next

Ispro

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 16
Posts 1927
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 06/05/2005

Ispro

Re: brant_point post# 161672

Tuesday, 03/25/2008 5:06:49 PM

Tuesday, March 25, 2008 5:06:49 PM

Post# of 249164
Munchen29 is dhamster, thanx ootommy! Don´t know who is muenchen.

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=19205604

Hamster will vote NO

The share options proposed at THIS point in time are, IMHO, excessive and unwarranted.

There is NO reason, IMHO, why reduced qtys of share options cannot be authorised annually.

In the event that the qty of share options now being sought are authorised then, IMHO, they will be exercised.

Wavoid permission will not be sought by share-option holders before exercising - and that's a fact!

Hamster

(a long time long)


BR

ISPRO

KEEP RACING

Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Next 10 Prev Next

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up