InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 0
Posts 21
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 04/05/2004

Re: Rawnoc post# 66

Tuesday, 04/06/2004 9:24:19 PM

Tuesday, April 06, 2004 9:24:19 PM

Post# of 204
That's how I felt, then developments DID come (Nestle) which indicated to me that CXN was the real deal. Buyers began to pay a premium to buy CXN stock after that (Jan 15th, 2004).

Read this message on Raging Bull, because it spoke directly to the issue (posted -with premonition?- 17-aug-2003): http://ragingbull.lycos.com/mboard/boards.cgi?board=CXN&read=504

"Granted it is RISKIER now than buying when it has a contract, and is expected to go up from there.. So, I'm not saying this is for everybody. Once it has contracts, the risk will be less, and more conservative investors could buy then with less risk, and hopefully still make a good profit. But, since I fell the contracts ARE coming, I am willing to take the higher risk"

The question seems to be one of risk tolerance. What does it take for you to see that CXN is the "real deal" and what do you consider to be a "development"? A premium is ALREADY there, based on the Nestle contract (share price was hovering around $2 before the Nestle contract).