Public traded company = publicly disclosed information.
If the company has some story they want to get out to the public at large, they can put it on their webpage or in their public filings. I don't like to work with selectively disclosed information. Not without getting paid for it. So, no, I haven't called them and don't intend to. I do think it's great that some investors are calling Terra Nova, and I hope that when Terra Nova decides they can't afford to raise their heating bill by an order of magnitude and cancels the deal, that those investors will listen to Terra Nova with an open mind.
Striper, you asked earlier about why the revenue for a transaction in January should be in the next annual report. I haven't had time to check back with the history of annual reports they file. And they file a lot of late reports. But generally, reporting companies file 4 quarterly reports per year. The quarter that has the annual report is often a month late to make time for the annual report. The last quarterly report was in December. So the next annual report should be the quarterly report that covers January 2004. The recycling revenue should be there.
Rager I have been reading your name wrong. No wonder why conversations with you are like talking with Zach de la Mesa. We certainly have truth in advertising with your ID. You asked why I would be surprised that the lawyer would advise against publishing the patent, on the grounds that people would use the information in the patent to bash the company. The reason is that that sounds a lot like the lawyer making himself an accessory to the fact. Why would he do that? The lawyer is just going to advise the company on what their options are, and if they are want to make sure that nobody knows any more about them because it all looks bad, then that's their decision. The lawyer is not going to tell his client that the gig is up if they let out what they are doing, so they better keep quiet. Whoever told you that was just making it up, misunderstanding what he was hearing, or passing on a misunderstanding.
