InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 29
Posts 25865
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 09/11/2002

Re: ChipGeek post# 59741

Saturday, 03/15/2008 6:59:31 PM

Saturday, March 15, 2008 6:59:31 PM

Post# of 151748
Re: I'm surprised that Hans is sticking to his 256k L2 size estimate. That sure doesn't look like 1/8th the size of the 2MB chunk of L3 to me. Looks more like 1/4 the size. Doesn't it?

It looks somewhat between 1/4 and 1/8, but Hans accounted for that in his density assumptions at the top of the photo. I would expect L2 cache to be less dense than L3, because it is closer to the CPU, likely runs faster, and therefore requires additional logic to reduce FIT rate.
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent INTC News